Fuck Scale

One of the hardest things to do is have a sensible business conversation with programmers.

Our training and experience teaches us to decouple complexity. We write modular code. We unit test. Even our server architecture is broken down to small independent units called a microservice.

We believe the best quality work has reduced complexity and simple independent parts working together.

Why do we immediately ignore everything we know to be true when the subject of the conversation is business?

We tend to think of scale as this magical property to be sprinkled on a concept that doesn’t quite add up to turn it into a lucrative, profitable, worthwhile venture.

It isn’t and you should stop talking about it like it is. If you can’t turn a profit on a transaction, what makes you think any multiple of those transactions will somehow manage to turn it into good business?

A chilling quote from a former Homejoy employee captures my entire sentiment.

At Homejoy a lot of us, myself included, got drunk under the majestic startupville spell. The hangover was rough. The swirling tales of companies that had found success circumventing basic business principles had taken root. We were all too often a pack of disillusioned startup junkies that swore that even basic math could be defied by growth and startup voodoo. Let’s discount $100+ cleanings down to $19. Not to worry, growth fixes everything. Let’s lock customers into discount rates that even with infinite retention won’t become profitable. Let’s just rub the magic startup lamp. The startup genie never showed and growth didn’t fix everything.
Pondering Homejoy’s Failure

My skin crawls when scale is used as validation for a business strategy. It’s basically euphemism for “we can’t figure out how to make this work, but let’s throw some layers of complication and big numbers in the mix … something will stick eventually”.

Make it work at the lowest unit of calculation. Scale brings some advantages and even more disadvantages. It takes skill to work at scale. It’s not a land flowing with milk, honey and no giants. There are many giants. And dragons and other evil mythical creatures that eat unicorns every day.

dragon_vs_unicorn_by_giantly-d87em3b

Next time you want to talk about business, don’t ever bring up scale as a justification for anything. In fact, don’t even bring it up. Period.

Fuck scale.

Get New Posts via Email

I don't always post, but when I do, you can get it sent directly to your inbox.

Join 10 other subscribers

  • Adim Ofunne

    I totally agree, like if my product is not generating revenue from the first transaction, use etc I just kind of lose interest. The people that love the scale approach feel that if you are able to create something that captures the world attention, you can then make a fraction of them do A or buy B which is true, but you are trivializing the effort needed to build a community and hold the attention of enough people on your product. One in a million people make it, the facebooks, twitters and instagrams of the world and if you look at big companies like twitter they are still struggling and instagram probably would have to if they were not bought by facebook and facbook too 700+ million in funding before they could stand on their own feet. I am all about creating real value, charging a reasonable amount for it and growing. That is why I have so much love for 37 signals.

    • Making profit before layers of abstraction is so helpful.

      The simpler and clearer the path to profit is, the better.

      Complicated strategies should extract additional value, making them complementary tactics.

      Using them as the core strategy just leaves more ways for things to not go as planned.

  • Casman

    couldn’t have said it better myself, kind sir. great post.